SINDKHEDA
Assembly seat no. 8 in Maharashtra · Vidhan Sabha seat contested 14 times since 1962.
Every election in this seat
| Year | Winner | Runner-up | Margin | Margin % | Candidates | Turnout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | BJPJAYKUMAR JITENDRASINH RAWAL | NCP(SP)BEDSE SANDEEP TRYAMBAKRAO | 95,884 | 42.39% | 12 | 66.2% |
| 2019 | BJPJaykumar Jitendrasinh Rawal | NCPBedse Sandeep Tryambakrao | 42,915 | 21.40% | 7 | 61.3% |
| 2014 | BJPJAYKUMAR JITENDRASINH RAWAL | NCPBEDSE SANDEEP TRAYAMBAKRAO | 42,158 | 21.20% | 10 | 64.8% |
| 2009 | BJPRAWAL JAIKUMARBHAU JITENDRASINH | INCSANER SHAMKANT RAGHUNATH | 50,699 | 30.22% | 12 | 61.2% |
| 20041973 boundaries | INDANNASAHEB D V PATIL | SHSPATIL RAMKRUSHNA DODHA | 5,672 | 4.83% | 9 | 66.1% |
| 19991973 boundaries | SHSPATIL RAMKRISHNA DODHA | NCPRAWAL JITENDRASINHG JAYSINHG ALIAS SARKARSAHEB | 6,213 | 6.53% | 5 | 59.2% |
| 19951973 boundaries | JDRAJPUT MANGALSING NIMJI ALIAS THANSING JIBHAU | INCBHADANE DATTATRAY WAMAN | 7,518 | 7.58% | 27 | 65.8% |
| 19901973 boundaries | INCBHADANE DATTATRAY WAMAN | JDRAJPUT THANSING JIBHAU ALIAS MANGALSING NIMJI | 17,249 | 19.94% | 10 | 67.3% |
| 19851973 boundaries | INDRAJAPUT MANGALSING NIMAJI ALIAS THANSING JIBHAU | INCPATIL VIDYATAI LAXMAN | 2,982 | 4.48% | 11 | 59.4% |
| 19801973 boundaries | INC(I)PATIL RANGRAO MADHAVRAO | JNPJPSHISODE MADHUKARRAO DIPCHAND | 2,728 | 4.49% | 5 | 58.6% |
| 19781973 boundaries | INDSHISODE MADHUKARRAO DIPCHAND | JNPRAJPUT MANGALSING NIMJI ALIAS THANSING JIBHAU | 2,078 | 3.05% | 6 | 69.8% |
| 19721966 boundaries | INCLILABAI UTTAMRAO PATIL | SOPRAGHUNATH CHINDHA PATIL | 14,095 | 28.47% | 5 | 54.9% |
| 19671966 boundaries | INCN. S. PATIL | PSPR. C. PATIL | 16,161 | 36.01% | 3 | 53.5% |
| 19621961 boundaries | INCNARAYANRAO SAHADEORAO PATIL | PSPBABURAO NABAJI DESAI | 27,539 | 55.73% | 5 | 57.1% |
Rows are matched by assembly constituency name within the state, so a seat that survived a delimitation keeps one continuous page. Where a year’s boundaries differ from the present ones the row says so — the name is the same, the territory is not.