ERANDOL
Assembly seat no. 16 in Maharashtra · Vidhan Sabha seat contested 13 times since 1962.
Maharashtra also has a Lok Sabha constituency called ERANDOL. It is a different territory with a different electorate — see its 9 results.
Every election in this seat
| Year | Winner | Runner-up | Margin | Margin % | Candidates | Turnout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | SHSAMOL CHIMANRAO PATIL | NCP(SP)ANNASAHEB DR. SATISH BHASKARRAO PATIL | 56,332 | 27.66% | 13 | 69.2% |
| 2019 | SHSCHIMANRAO RUPCHAND PATIL | NCPANNASAHEB DR. SATISH BHASKARRAO PATIL | 18,002 | 10.09% | 8 | 63.6% |
| 2014 | NCPANNASAHEB DR. SATISH BHASKARRAO PATIL | SHSPATIL CHIMANRAO RUPCHAND | 1,983 | 1.17% | 11 | 66.0% |
| 2009 | SHSPATIL CHIMANRAO RUPCHAND | NCPANNASAHEB DR. SATISH BHASKARRAO PATIL | 3,298 | 2.25% | 11 | 62.3% |
| 20041973 boundaries | SHSPATIL GULABRAO RAGHUNATH | INCPATIL MAHENDRASINGH DHARAMSINGH | 11,338 | 8.00% | 7 | 70.5% |
| 19991973 boundaries | SHSPATIL GULAB RAGHUNATH | JD(S)PATIL MAHENDRASINH DHARAMSINH | 4,090 | 3.91% | 8 | 60.3% |
| 19951973 boundaries | JDPATIL MAHENDRASINH DHARAMSINH | SHSMAHAJAN RAMESH JAGANNATH | 18,986 | 15.14% | 15 | 74.6% |
| 19901973 boundaries | SHSHARI ATMARAM MAHAJAN | INCWAGH PARVATABAI CHANDRABHAN | 4,617 | 4.71% | 13 | 62.1% |
| 19851973 boundaries | INCWAGH PARUBHAI CHANDRABHAN | INDPATIL NIMBAJIRAO BALIRAM | 4,958 | 6.72% | 8 | 56.8% |
| 19801973 boundaries | INC(I)WAGH PAUBAI CHANDRABHAN | JNPJPPATIL VIJAN DHANAJI | 6,161 | 11.90% | 7 | 43.0% |
| 19781973 boundaries | JNPPATIL MAHENDRASINH DHARMSINH | INC(I)WAGH PARWATABAI CHANDRABHAN | 6,562 | 8.55% | 5 | 69.5% |
| 19721966 boundaries | INCDIGAMBAR SHANKAR PATIL | SOPM. DATTATRAYA DANDAWATE | 16,960 | 33.42% | 3 | 55.1% |
| 19621961 boundaries | INCDIGAMBAR SHANKAR PATIL | INDYOGARAJASINHA SHANKARSINHA PARIHAR | 10,616 | 24.29% | 4 | 58.9% |
Rows are matched by assembly constituency name within the state, so a seat that survived a delimitation keeps one continuous page. Where a year’s boundaries differ from the present ones the row says so — the name is the same, the territory is not.