TEJ SINGH
54 candidacies between 1962 and 2022, 7 won, across 37 constituencies.
Every contest
| Year | Constituency | House | Party | Votes | Share | Position | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | CHHATAUttar Pradesh | AE | IND | 663 | 0.28% | 8 | Lost |
| 2022 | NAGINAUttar Pradesh | AE | AMBEDKARSA… | 226 | 0.10% | 12 | Lost |
| 2019 | NAGINAUttar Pradesh | LS | ASP | 2,169 | 0.21% | 7 | Lost |
| 2018 | SumerpurRajasthan | AE | RSPS | 473 | 0.27% | 11 | Lost |
| 2018 | BharatpurRajasthan | AE | DKD | 326 | 0.19% | 15 | Lost |
| 2014 | NAGINAUttar Pradesh | LS | ASP | 1,845 | 0.20% | 11 | Lost |
| 2012 | CHARKHARIUttar Pradesh | AE | ASP | 621 | 0.32% | 17 | Lost |
| 2012 | CHHATAUttar Pradesh | AE | AIMF | 3,942 | 1.87% | 6 | Lost |
| 2012 | BABERUUttar Pradesh | AE | ASP | 1,896 | 1.10% | 9 | Lost |
| 2009 | NAGINAUttar Pradesh | LS | ASP | 2,446 | 0.38% | 11 | Lost |
| 2008 | JauraMadhya Pradesh | AE | IND | 300 | 0.26% | 17 | Lost |
| 2004 | ALIGARHUttar Pradesh | LS | ASP | 1,054 | 0.17% | 10 | Lost |
| 2003 | QARAWAL NAGARDelhi | AE | IND | 349 | 0.33% | 13 | Lost |
| 2002 | HALDWANIUttarakhand | AE | IND | 320 | 0.52% | 10 | Lost |
| 2002 | RAMNAGARUttar Pradesh | AE | RTKP | 2,333 | 1.82% | 7 | Lost |
| 2002 | SEOHARAUttar Pradesh | AE | IND | 437 | 0.27% | 12 | Lost |
| 2002 | ORAIUttar Pradesh | AE | BKD | 624 | 0.40% | 9 | Lost |
| 1998 | MANGOLPURIDelhi | AE | JD | 844 | 1.59% | 5 | Lost |
| 1998 | NARSIMHAPURMadhya Pradesh | AE | JD | 1,158 | 1.27% | 4 | Lost |
| 1996 | BHINDMadhya Pradesh | LS | IND | 330 | 0.07% | 33 | Lost |
| 1993 | JEWARUttar Pradesh | AE | DDP | 206 | 0.23% | 12 | Lost |
| 1993 | MALPURARajasthan | AE | DDP | 505 | 0.54% | 6 | Lost |
| 1993 | BHARATPURRajasthan | AE | IND | 47 | 0.06% | 25 | Lost |
| 1993 | MANGOLPURIDelhi | AE | JD | 7,207 | 14.01% | 3 | Lost |
| 1990 | CHACHIOTHimachal Pradesh | AE | IND | 110 | 0.36% | 6 | Lost |
| 1990 | SONKATCHMadhya Pradesh | AE | IND | 208 | 0.34% | 8 | Lost |
| 1990 | MANDALGARHRajasthan | AE | IND | 338 | 0.42% | 9 | Lost |
| 1989 | GOKULUttar Pradesh | AE | IND | 353 | 0.44% | 6 | Lost |
| 1985 | AHORERajasthan | AE | IND | 1,691 | 2.96% | 4 | Lost |
| 1985 | BHINDMadhya Pradesh | AE | IND | 3,471 | 6.06% | 5 | Lost |
| 1982 | MEWLA MAHARAJPURHaryana | AE | IND | 1,218 | 1.95% | 4 | Lost |
| 1980 | BAGHA PURANAPunjab | AE | SAD | 25,694 | 46.21% | 1 | Elected |
| 1980 | DADRIUttar Pradesh | AE | JNPSC | 13,580 | 21.42% | 2 | Lost |
| 1977 | MAHENDRAGARHHaryana | AE | IND | 470 | 0.90% | 5 | Lost |
| 1977 | DADRIUttar Pradesh | AE | JNP | 35,907 | 64.23% | 1 | Elected |
| 1977 | BAGHA PURANAPunjab | AE | SAD | 29,665 | 53.87% | 1 | Elected |
| 1977 | SIKARRajasthan | LS | RRP | 7,612 | 1.96% | 4 | Lost |
| 1974 | KASGANJUttar Pradesh | AE | IND | 759 | 1.02% | 8 | Lost |
| 1974 | GHAZIABADUttar Pradesh | AE | IND | 243 | 0.39% | 15 | Lost |
| 1974 | DADRIUttar Pradesh | AE | NCO | 22,489 | 30.94% | 1 | Elected |
| 1974 | SEOHARAUttar Pradesh | AE | IND | 3,935 | 5.36% | 5 | Lost |
| 1972 | BAGHA PURANAPunjab | AE | SAD | 23,450 | 44.92% | 2 | Lost |
| 1972 | PACHPADRARajasthan | AE | IND | 22,235 | 46.86% | 2 | Lost |
| 1969 | BAGHA PURANAPunjab | AE | INC | 28,865 | 53.72% | 1 | Elected |
| 1969 | DADRIUttar Pradesh | AE | INC | 15,673 | 21.61% | 2 | Lost |
| 1962 | BUDHLADAPunjab | AE | AD | 16,951 | 41.24% | 1 | Elected |
| 1962 | AMBAHMadhya Pradesh | AE | JS | 774 | 2.91% | 7 | Lost |
| 1962 | SABALGARHMadhya Pradesh | AE | IND | 1,012 | 6.03% | 5 | Lost |
| 1962 | BHINDMadhya Pradesh | LS | JS | 22,320 | 9.81% | 3 | Lost |
| 1962 | MANDIHimachal Pradesh | LS | IND | 3,516 | 4.77% | 3 | Lost |
| 1962 | KHERAGARHUttar Pradesh | AE | SWA | 13,288 | 26.09% | 2 | Lost |
| 1962 | PACHPADRARajasthan | AE | IND | 2,831 | 8.94% | 3 | Lost |
| 1962 | GHAZIABADUttar Pradesh | AE | INC | 17,610 | 38.33% | 1 | Elected |
| 1962 | CHECHATRajasthan | AE | SOC | 1,963 | 6.36% | 3 | Lost |
Candidacies are grouped by a normalised name, which is the only key the source data offers. Two different people who share a name will appear on one page, and one person whose name was spelled differently across decades may appear on two. Check the constituency and party before treating a long career as a single person’s.
