GANGA SINGH
52 candidacies between 1962 and 2017, 7 won, across 37 constituencies.
Every contest
| Year | Constituency | House | Party | Votes | Share | Position | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | KHALILABADUttar Pradesh | AE | RLD | 6,872 | 3.07% | 5 | Lost |
| 2009 | GOHANAHaryana | AE | IND | 508 | 0.61% | 9 | Lost |
| 2009 | HISARHaryana | AE | SMBHP | 135 | 0.17% | 15 | Lost |
| 2009 | JALORERajasthan | LS | SP | 8,927 | 1.55% | 9 | Lost |
| 2008 | SADAR BAZARDelhi | AE | SP | 776 | 0.87% | 4 | Lost |
| 2007 | PURANPURUttar Pradesh | AE | BRPP | 506 | 0.30% | 16 | Lost |
| 1999 | NAINITALUttar Pradesh | LS | IND | 1,930 | 0.24% | 7 | Lost |
| 1998 | JAMWA RAMGARHRajasthan | AE | IND | 963 | 1.04% | 6 | Lost |
| 1998 | MAKRANARajasthan | AE | IND | 9,753 | 8.62% | 4 | Lost |
| 1996 | MATUttar Pradesh | AE | IND | 91 | 0.08% | 11 | Lost |
| 1996 | GOVIND NAGARUttar Pradesh | AE | BSP | 51,041 | 25.83% | 2 | Lost |
| 1996 | MANDIHimachal Pradesh | LS | SP | 6,460 | 1.23% | 3 | Lost |
| 1995 | SASARAMBihar | AE | IND | 117 | 0.10% | 27 | Lost |
| 1993 | TEONTHARMadhya Pradesh | AE | CPI | 1,325 | 1.39% | 6 | Lost |
| 1991 | JAIPURRajasthan | LS | IND | 281 | 0.05% | 19 | Lost |
| 1991 | JINDHaryana | AE | IND | 25 | 0.03% | 35 | Lost |
| 1991 | FAZILNAGARUttar Pradesh | AE | BJP | 36,728 | 37.45% | 2 | Lost |
| 1991 | LUCKNOW WESTUttar Pradesh | AE | IND | 84 | 0.10% | 12 | Lost |
| 1991 | NAWABGANJUttar Pradesh | AE | IND | 91 | 0.10% | 24 | Lost |
| 1990 | JAMWA RAMGARHRajasthan | AE | JNPJP | 602 | 0.94% | 7 | Lost |
| 1989 | LUCKNOW WESTUttar Pradesh | AE | IND | 363 | 0.59% | 6 | Lost |
| 1989 | AURAIYAUttar Pradesh | AE | IND | 327 | 0.31% | 10 | Lost |
| 1989 | NAWABGANJUttar Pradesh | AE | IND | 525 | 0.61% | 10 | Lost |
| 1989 | FAZILNAGARUttar Pradesh | AE | BJP | 7,213 | 7.16% | 6 | Lost |
| 1987 | JINDHaryana | AE | IND | 24 | 0.03% | 22 | Lost |
| 1985 | MAINPURIUttar Pradesh | AE | JNP | 5,013 | 7.95% | 4 | Lost |
| 1985 | NIDHAULI KALANUttar Pradesh | AE | IND | 143 | 0.21% | 12 | Lost |
| 1985 | SARVANKHERAUttar Pradesh | AE | IND | 354 | 0.43% | 16 | Lost |
| 1984 | SIKARRajasthan | LS | IND | 6,244 | 1.12% | 6 | Lost |
| 1982 | JOGINDER NAGARHimachal Pradesh | AE | BJP | 3,692 | 15.65% | 3 | Lost |
| 1980 | NIDHAULI KALANUttar Pradesh | AE | INC(U) | 6,179 | 9.89% | 3 | Lost |
| 1980 | SIKARRajasthan | LS | IND | 9,833 | 2.21% | 6 | Lost |
| 1980 | MANDIHimachal Pradesh | LS | JNP | 1,08,595 | 36.82% | 2 | Lost |
| 1977 | NAGARRajasthan | AE | IND | 562 | 1.29% | 8 | Lost |
| 1977 | NIDHAULI KALANUttar Pradesh | AE | INC | 11,389 | 24.53% | 2 | Lost |
| 1977 | MASUDARajasthan | AE | JNP | 13,502 | 35.47% | 2 | Lost |
| 1977 | MANDIHimachal Pradesh | LS | BLD | 1,38,143 | 53.19% | 1 | Elected |
| 1974 | NIDHAULI KALANUttar Pradesh | AE | BKD | 18,945 | 30.55% | 1 | Elected |
| 1974 | PAURIUttar Pradesh | AE | BJS | 3,803 | 10.31% | 3 | Lost |
| 1974 | DADRAULUttar Pradesh | AE | BJS | 5,115 | 7.76% | 5 | Lost |
| 1972 | TEONTHARMadhya Pradesh | AE | CPI | 10,939 | 25.00% | 2 | Lost |
| 1972 | SUNDERNAGARHimachal Pradesh | AE | BJS | 6,886 | 32.00% | 1 | Elected |
| 1972 | JAYALRajasthan | AE | SWA | 7,086 | 11.52% | 3 | Lost |
| 1971 | PHULPURUttar Pradesh | LS | IND | 5,581 | 2.33% | 5 | Lost |
| 1969 | NIDHAULI KALANUttar Pradesh | AE | BKD | 15,969 | 27.23% | 1 | Elected |
| 1969 | EKESHWARUttar Pradesh | AE | BKD | 486 | 1.55% | 8 | Lost |
| 1962 | MAREHRAUttar Pradesh | AE | IND | 1,489 | 3.53% | 6 | Lost |
| 1962 | HINDOLIRajasthan | AE | INC | 7,015 | 47.26% | 1 | Elected |
| 1962 | TEONTHARMadhya Pradesh | AE | CPI | 2,577 | 11.37% | 3 | Lost |
| 1962 | ALMORAUttar Pradesh | AE | INC | 17,545 | 57.50% | 1 | Elected |
| 1962 | POWAYANUttar Pradesh | AE | JS | 2,815 | 8.23% | 5 | Lost |
| 1962 | JAYALRajasthan | AE | SWA | 10,472 | 33.57% | 1 | Elected |
Candidacies are grouped by a normalised name, which is the only key the source data offers. Two different people who share a name will appear on one page, and one person whose name was spelled differently across decades may appear on two. Check the constituency and party before treating a long career as a single person’s.
