BHANWAR SINGH
57 candidacies between 1962 and 2018, 9 won, across 44 constituencies.
Every contest
| Year | Constituency | House | Party | Votes | Share | Position | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | SardarpuraRajasthan | AE | BVHNP | 132 | 0.09% | 12 | Lost |
| 2018 | Kota NorthRajasthan | AE | BYS | 120 | 0.07% | 11 | Lost |
| 2013 | Marwar JunctionRajasthan | AE | NPEP | 666 | 0.44% | 8 | Lost |
| 2013 | MakranaRajasthan | AE | JGP | 1,266 | 0.79% | 7 | Lost |
| 2013 | MasudaRajasthan | AE | IND | 3,390 | 2.02% | 8 | Lost |
| 2013 | PUSPRAJGARHMadhya Pradesh | AE | IND | 1,037 | 0.75% | 12 | Lost |
| 2013 | NawalgarhRajasthan | AE | NPEP | 610 | 0.38% | 9 | Lost |
| 2013 | KolayatRajasthan | AE | INC | 68,029 | 47.57% | 1 | Elected |
| 2013 | ChhabraRajasthan | AE | BSP | 2,467 | 1.58% | 6 | Lost |
| 2008 | Vidhyadhar NagarRajasthan | AE | IND | 574 | 0.42% | 12 | Lost |
| 2008 | BhinmalRajasthan | AE | IND | 1,124 | 0.90% | 9 | Lost |
| 2008 | KekriRajasthan | AE | SP | 348 | 0.27% | 13 | Lost |
| 2008 | BansurRajasthan | AE | IND | 468 | 0.40% | 11 | Lost |
| 2007 | DAYALBAGHUttar Pradesh | AE | IND | 895 | 0.52% | 11 | Lost |
| 2003 | AJMER EASTRajasthan | AE | IND | 767 | 0.87% | 4 | Lost |
| 2003 | PUSHKARRajasthan | AE | IND | 29,630 | 26.03% | 3 | Lost |
| 2003 | MERTARajasthan | AE | BJP | 59,470 | 49.99% | 1 | Elected |
| 2003 | AMBERRajasthan | AE | RLD | 1,405 | 0.93% | 9 | Lost |
| 2003 | DANTA - RAMGARHRajasthan | AE | IND | 1,529 | 1.17% | 9 | Lost |
| 1998 | NAWALGARHRajasthan | AE | INC | 35,827 | 37.96% | 1 | Elected |
| 1998 | SUMERPURRajasthan | AE | IND | 11,490 | 14.05% | 4 | Lost |
| 1996 | MEERUTUttar Pradesh | LS | SMP | 918 | 0.14% | 7 | Lost |
| 1993 | AJMER EASTRajasthan | AE | IND | 390 | 0.54% | 5 | Lost |
| 1993 | NAWALGARHRajasthan | AE | INC | 30,668 | 32.21% | 1 | Elected |
| 1993 | TARANAGARRajasthan | AE | JD | 18,639 | 21.00% | 3 | Lost |
| 1993 | MERTARajasthan | AE | BJP | 43,794 | 52.41% | 1 | Elected |
| 1993 | DEEDWANARajasthan | AE | BJP | 22,456 | 24.28% | 2 | Lost |
| 1991 | MUZAFFARNAGARUttar Pradesh | AE | IND | 39 | 0.03% | 36 | Lost |
| 1991 | MORNAUttar Pradesh | AE | IND | 146 | 0.16% | 16 | Lost |
| 1991 | BHIWANIHaryana | LS | IND | 431 | 0.07% | 33 | Lost |
| 1990 | KHETRIRajasthan | AE | IND | 133 | 0.17% | 9 | Lost |
| 1990 | TARANAGARRajasthan | AE | JNPJP | 5,957 | 7.55% | 4 | Lost |
| 1990 | FATEHPURRajasthan | AE | IND | 149 | 0.15% | 14 | Lost |
| 1990 | BEAWARRajasthan | AE | IND | 38 | 0.06% | 29 | Lost |
| 1989 | BAHUttar Pradesh | AE | DDP | 448 | 0.46% | 8 | Lost |
| 1989 | NAKURUttar Pradesh | AE | BSP | 1,197 | 0.92% | 3 | Lost |
| 1985 | DEEDWANARajasthan | AE | IND | 390 | 0.62% | 9 | Lost |
| 1985 | NAWALGARHRajasthan | AE | INC | 35,819 | 47.28% | 2 | Lost |
| 1985 | KHANDELARajasthan | AE | ICS | 560 | 0.79% | 4 | Lost |
| 1984 | SIKARRajasthan | LS | IND | 2,847 | 0.51% | 9 | Lost |
| 1982 | TOSHAMHaryana | AE | JNP | 1,078 | 1.97% | 6 | Lost |
| 1980 | NAWALGARHRajasthan | AE | INC(I) | 21,261 | 35.27% | 1 | Elected |
| 1980 | MARWAHIMadhya Pradesh | AE | INC(I) | 18,894 | 69.47% | 1 | Elected |
| 1977 | TOSHAMHaryana | AE | IND | 1,073 | 2.21% | 3 | Lost |
| 1977 | TAORUHaryana | AE | IND | 554 | 1.17% | 5 | Lost |
| 1977 | FEROZEPUR JHIRKAHaryana | AE | IND | 1,141 | 2.66% | 8 | Lost |
| 1977 | NAWALGARHRajasthan | AE | INC | 8,398 | 16.52% | 3 | Lost |
| 1977 | NAWANRajasthan | AE | JNP | 17,430 | 36.81% | 2 | Lost |
| 1974 | FATEHBADUttar Pradesh | AE | IND | 399 | 0.66% | 13 | Lost |
| 1972 | DUNGARGARHRajasthan | AE | SWA | 2,590 | 5.28% | 3 | Lost |
| 1972 | NAWALGARHRajasthan | AE | INC | 26,151 | 59.24% | 1 | Elected |
| 1972 | DIGODRajasthan | AE | IND | 1,521 | 3.54% | 4 | Lost |
| 1971 | MAINPURIUttar Pradesh | LS | IND | 8,167 | 3.96% | 6 | Lost |
| 1962 | DEEDWANARajasthan | AE | IND | 904 | 2.07% | 3 | Lost |
| 1962 | SIKARRajasthan | LS | RRP | 7,654 | 3.01% | 7 | Lost |
| 1962 | DEGANARajasthan | AE | IND | 899 | 3.07% | 5 | Lost |
| 1962 | PALLARIMadhya Pradesh | AE | PSP | 4,455 | 40.33% | 1 | Elected |
Candidacies are grouped by a normalised name, which is the only key the source data offers. Two different people who share a name will appear on one page, and one person whose name was spelled differently across decades may appear on two. Check the constituency and party before treating a long career as a single person’s.
