ALWAR
Constituency no. 8 in Rajasthan · Lok Sabha seat contested 16 times since 1962.
Rajasthan also has an assembly constituency called ALWAR. It is a different territory with a different electorate — see its 10 results.
Every election in this seat
| Year | Winner | Runner-up | Margin | Margin % | Candidates | Turnout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | BJPBHUPENDER YADAV | INCLALIT YADAV | 48,282 | 3.85% | 9 | — |
| 2019 | BJPBalak Nath | INCBhanwar Jitendra Singh | 3,29,971 | 26.07% | 11 | 67.0% |
| 2014 | BJPCHAND NATH | INCBHANWAR JITENDRA SINGH | 2,83,895 | 26.72% | 19 | 65.3% |
| 2009 | INCJITENDRA SINGH | BJPDR.KIRAN YADAV | 1,56,619 | 20.53% | 16 | 55.5% |
| 20041973 boundaries | INCDR. KARAN SINGH YADAV | BJPMAHANT CHANDNATH | 8,371 | 1.54% | 12 | 43.0% |
| 19991973 boundaries | BJPDr. Jaswant Singh Yadav | INCMahendra Kumari | 57,928 | 9.42% | 8 | 53.2% |
| 19981973 boundaries | INCGHASI RAM YADAV | INDMAHENDRA KUMARI | 2,561 | 0.39% | 15 | 57.9% |
| 19961973 boundaries | INCNAWAL KISHORE | BJPJASWANT SINGH YADAV | 2,433 | 0.56% | 45 | 38.3% |
| 19911973 boundaries | BJPMAHENDRA KUMARI (W) | INCRAM SINGH YADAV | 1,03,406 | 24.79% | 24 | 43.3% |
| 19891973 boundaries | JDRAMJI LAL YADAV | INCRAM SINGH YADAV | 88,515 | 19.48% | 11 | 47.8% |
| 19841973 boundaries | INCRAM SINGH YADEV | INDSAMPAT RAM | 1,25,531 | 30.36% | 13 | 55.0% |
| 19801973 boundaries | INC(I)RAM SINGH YADAV | JNPRAMJI LAL YADAV | 19,287 | 6.06% | 14 | 47.9% |
| 19771973 boundaries | BLDRAMJI LAL YADAV | INCHARI PRASHAD | 1,72,478 | 55.11% | 5 | 54.8% |
| 19711966 boundaries | INCHARI PRASAD | VHPKUMAR SUMITRADEVI | 74,137 | 23.64% | 8 | 55.6% |
| 19671966 boundaries | INCB. NATH | SSPK. RAM | 34,586 | 11.54% | 5 | 58.4% |
| 19621961 boundaries | INDKASHI RAM | INCSOBHA RAM | 23,116 | 8.60% | 6 | 59.5% |
Rows are matched by constituency name within the state, so a seat that survived a delimitation keeps one continuous page. Where a year’s boundaries differ from the present ones the row says so — the name is the same, the territory is not.