UJJAIN
Constituency no. 22 in Madhya Pradesh · reserved for Scheduled Castes · Lok Sabha seat contested 16 times since 1962.
Every election in this seat
| Year | Winner | Runner-up | Margin | Margin % | Candidates | Turnout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | BJPANIL FIROJIYA | INCMAHESH PARMAR | 3,75,860 | 28.29% | 9 | — |
| 2019 | BJPANIL FIROJIYA | INCBABULAL MALVIYA | 3,65,637 | 29.19% | 9 | 75.4% |
| 2014 | BJPPROF. CHINTAMANI MALVIYA | INCPREMCHAND GUDDU | 3,09,663 | 30.47% | 12 | 66.6% |
| 2009 | INCGUDDU PREMCHAND | BJPDR. SATYANARAYAN JATIYA | 15,841 | 2.37% | 9 | 53.3% |
| 20041973 boundaries | BJPDR. SATYANARAYAN JATIYA | INCPREMCHAND GUDDU | 70,403 | 9.77% | 11 | 58.0% |
| 19991973 boundaries | BJPDr. Satyanarayan Jatiya | INCTulasiram Silawat | 68,038 | 10.25% | 8 | 60.0% |
| 19981973 boundaries | BJPDR. SATYANARAYAN JATIYA | INCDR. AVANTIKA PRASAD MARMAT | 93,887 | 15.11% | 7 | 60.3% |
| 19961973 boundaries | BJPSATYANARIAN JATIYA | INCSIDHNATHA PARIHAR | 1,11,257 | 19.23% | 25 | 56.7% |
| 19911973 boundaries | BJPSATYANARAYAN JATIYA | INCSAJJANSINGH VERMA | 51,720 | 11.78% | 13 | 48.2% |
| 19891973 boundaries | BJPSATYANARAYAN JATIYA | INCSATYANARAYAN PAWAR | 1,02,194 | 20.93% | 8 | 55.0% |
| 19841973 boundaries | INCSATYANARAYAN PAWAR | BJPSATYANARAYAN JATIYA | 42,359 | 9.87% | 9 | 62.0% |
| 19801973 boundaries | JNPSATYANARAYAN JATIYA | INC(I)SUJJAN SINGH VISHNAR | 11,326 | 3.16% | 9 | 58.2% |
| 19771973 boundaries | BLDHUKUMCHAND KACHHAWAY | INCDURGADAS SURYAVANSHI | 69,097 | 19.46% | 5 | 64.5% |
| 19711966 boundaries | BJSPHOOLCHAND VERMA | INCBAPULAL MALVIYA | 8,596 | 2.84% | 5 | 54.6% |
| 19671966 boundaries | BJSHUKUMCHAND | INCD. SURYAVANSHI | 55,331 | 17.51% | 3 | 63.3% |
| 19621961 boundaries | INCRADHELAL VYAS | INDMAHENDRA BHATNAGAR | 28,671 | 13.15% | 6 | 49.2% |
Rows are matched by constituency name within the state, so a seat that survived a delimitation keeps one continuous page. Where a year’s boundaries differ from the present ones the row says so — the name is the same, the territory is not.

