REWA
Constituency no. 10 in Madhya Pradesh · Lok Sabha seat contested 16 times since 1962.
Madhya Pradesh also has an assembly constituency called REWA. It is a different territory with a different electorate — see its 10 results.
Every election in this seat
| Year | Winner | Runner-up | Margin | Margin % | Candidates | Turnout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | BJPJANARDAN MISHRA | INCNEELAM ABHAY MISHRA | 1,93,374 | 21.06% | 14 | — |
| 2019 | BJPJANARDAN MISHRA | INCSIDDHARTH TIWARI (RAJ) | 3,12,808 | 30.87% | 23 | 60.3% |
| 2014 | BJPJANARDAN MISHRA | INCSUNDERLAL TIWARI | 1,68,726 | 20.33% | 14 | 53.7% |
| 2009 | BSPDEORAJ SINGH PATEL | INCSUNDER LAL TIWARI | 4,021 | 0.67% | 15 | 48.3% |
| 20041973 boundaries | BJPCHANDRAMANI TRIPATHI | BSPPRADEEP KUMAR PATEL | 44,752 | 7.10% | 12 | 43.2% |
| 19991973 boundaries | INCSunder Lal Tiwari | BSPRamalakhan Singh Patel | 64,151 | 8.67% | 14 | 54.0% |
| 19981973 boundaries | BJPCHANDRAMANI TRIPATHI | BSPBHIM SINGH PATEL | 68,973 | 9.15% | 14 | 57.9% |
| 19961973 boundaries | BSPBUDDHA HASEN PATEL | BJPPARVEEN KUMARI | 12,382 | 2.10% | 76 | 45.9% |
| 19911973 boundaries | BSPBHEEM SINGH PATEL | INCSHRINIWAS TIWARI | 14,316 | 3.23% | 16 | 41.3% |
| 19891973 boundaries | JDYAMUNA PRASAD SHASTRI | INCPRAVIN KUMARI | 74,756 | 14.28% | 23 | 49.5% |
| 19841973 boundaries | INCMARTAND SINGH | JNPYAMUNA PRASAD SHASTRI | 1,16,829 | 26.61% | 14 | 54.8% |
| 19801973 boundaries | INDMAHARAJA MARTAND SINGH | JNPYAMUNA PRASAD SHASTRI | 2,38,351 | 59.49% | 11 | 55.8% |
| 19771973 boundaries | BLDYAMMUNA PRASAD | INDMAHA MARTAND SINGH | 6,693 | 1.82% | 4 | 55.7% |
| 19711966 boundaries | INDMAHARAJA MARTAND SINGH | INCSHAMBHU NATH SHUKLA | 1,99,694 | 57.18% | 4 | 58.4% |
| 19671966 boundaries | INCS.N. SHUKLA | SSPM. SINGH | 57,839 | 18.09% | 7 | 57.1% |
| 19621961 boundaries | INCSHIV DUTTA | SOCACHHELAL SINGH | 14,175 | 7.08% | 9 | 44.6% |
Rows are matched by constituency name within the state, so a seat that survived a delimitation keeps one continuous page. Where a year’s boundaries differ from the present ones the row says so — the name is the same, the territory is not.
