BETUL
Constituency no. 29 in Madhya Pradesh · reserved for Scheduled Tribes · Lok Sabha seat contested 15 times since 1967.
Madhya Pradesh also has an assembly constituency called BETUL. It is a different territory with a different electorate — see its 10 results.
Every election in this seat
| Year | Winner | Runner-up | Margin | Margin % | Candidates | Turnout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | BJPDURGADAS (D. D.) UIKEY | INCRAMU TEKAM | 3,79,761 | 27.20% | 8 | — |
| 2019 | BJPDURGA DAS (D.D.) UIKEY | INCRAMU TEKAM (ADVOCATE) | 3,60,241 | 26.53% | 9 | 78.2% |
| 2014 | BJPJYOTI DHURVE | INCAJAY SHAH \MAKRAI\ | 3,28,614 | 31.36% | 8 | 65.2% |
| 2009 | BJPJYOTI DHURVE | INCOJHARAM EVANE | 97,317 | 15.29% | 16 | 49.5% |
| 20041973 boundaries | BJPKHANDELWAL VIJAY KUMAR (MUNNI BHAIA) | INCRAJENDRA JAISWAL | 1,57,540 | 28.76% | 8 | 48.8% |
| 19991973 boundaries | BJPVijay Kumar Khandelwal \ Munni Bhaiya\ | INCGufran Bhai | 64,472 | 12.07% | 5 | 52.3% |
| 19981973 boundaries | BJPVIJAY KUMAR KHANDELWAL (MUNNI BHAIYA) | INCDR. ASHOK SABLE | 39,666 | 7.06% | 7 | 59.0% |
| 19961973 boundaries | BJPVIJAY KUMAR KHANDELWAL | INCASLAM SHERKHAN | 1,12,076 | 22.49% | 29 | 52.9% |
| 19911973 boundaries | INCASLAM-SHER-KHAN | BJPARIF BAIG | 22,733 | 7.64% | 12 | 36.3% |
| 19891973 boundaries | BJPARIF BEG | INCASLAM SHERKHAN | 40,772 | 10.35% | 14 | 48.5% |
| 19841973 boundaries | INCASLAM SHERKHAN | INDM. N. BUCH | 37,950 | 12.10% | 6 | 51.1% |
| 19801973 boundaries | INC(I)GUFRAN AZAM | JNPSUBHASHCHANDRA AHUJA | 29,322 | 11.69% | 9 | 45.8% |
| 19771973 boundaries | BLDSUBHASH CHANDRA AHUJA | INCNARENDRA KUMAR SALVE | 26,923 | 12.22% | 6 | 43.7% |
| 19711966 boundaries | INCNARENDRA KUMA SALVE | BJSVASANT KUMAR PANDIT | 68,091 | 30.99% | 2 | 41.1% |
| 19671966 boundaries | INCS.N. KUMAR | BJSR.S.D. PRASAD | 13,899 | 6.20% | 3 | 44.4% |
Rows are matched by constituency name within the state, so a seat that survived a delimitation keeps one continuous page. Where a year’s boundaries differ from the present ones the row says so — the name is the same, the territory is not.
