VIRENDER SINGH
55 candidacies between 1977 and 2025, 11 won, across 46 constituencies.
Every contest
| Year | Constituency | House | Party | Votes | Share | Position | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | TUGHLAKABADDelhi | AE | INC | 2,313 | 2.01% | 3 | Lost |
| 2019 | KALANWALIHaryana | AE | IND | 290 | 0.22% | 9 | Lost |
| 2019 | SIRSAHaryana | LS | IND | 878 | 0.06% | 21 | Lost |
| 2017 | KHANPURUttarakhand | AE | IND | 338 | 0.32% | 8 | Lost |
| 2014 | MUZAFFARNAGARUttar Pradesh | LS | SP | 1,60,810 | 14.52% | 3 | Lost |
| 2009 | NALWAHaryana | AE | HASWP | 253 | 0.27% | 9 | Lost |
| 2009 | BERIHaryana | AE | AIFB | 65 | 0.07% | 16 | Lost |
| 2009 | KALKAHaryana | AE | BJP | 1,958 | 2.07% | 7 | Lost |
| 2009 | KURUKSHETRAHaryana | LS | IND | 2,132 | 0.24% | 9 | Lost |
| 2008 | BADARPURDelhi | AE | JD(U) | 247 | 0.22% | 8 | Lost |
| 2005 | SAFIDONHaryana | AE | SP | 173 | 0.17% | 12 | Lost |
| 2003 | MALVIYA NAGARDelhi | AE | RVNP | 91 | 0.17% | 8 | Lost |
| 2003 | MAHIPALPURDelhi | AE | IND | 306 | 0.46% | 8 | Lost |
| 2000 | PEHOWAHaryana | AE | IND | 287 | 0.33% | 10 | Lost |
| 2000 | GOHANAHaryana | AE | IND | 331 | 0.42% | 13 | Lost |
| 1998 | ADARSH NAGARDelhi | AE | RMEP | 96 | 0.16% | 8 | Lost |
| 1998 | HAUZ KHASDelhi | AE | IND | 1,301 | 2.54% | 3 | Lost |
| 1996 | BERIHaryana | AE | IND | 107 | 0.16% | 18 | Lost |
| 1996 | SAHARANPURUttar Pradesh | LS | IND | 272 | 0.04% | 31 | Lost |
| 1996 | ALLAHABADUttar Pradesh | LS | IND | 119 | 0.02% | 70 | Lost |
| 1995 | ATRIBihar | AE | BPP | 18,505 | 13.96% | 3 | Lost |
| 1995 | BANIAPURBihar | AE | BPP | 1,578 | 1.72% | 9 | Lost |
| 1993 | BHARTHANAUttar Pradesh | AE | IND | 32 | 0.03% | 37 | Lost |
| 1993 | NIDHAULI KALANUttar Pradesh | AE | IND | 48 | 0.04% | 26 | Lost |
| 1993 | MURADNAGARUttar Pradesh | AE | IND | 70 | 0.06% | 18 | Lost |
| 1993 | KANDHLAUttar Pradesh | AE | JD | 46,756 | 36.81% | 2 | Lost |
| 1993 | ADARSH NAGARDelhi | AE | RMEP | 162 | 0.33% | 7 | Lost |
| 1991 | GURGAONHaryana | AE | IND | 49 | 0.06% | 21 | Lost |
| 1991 | MUNDHAL KHURDHaryana | AE | IND | 10 | 0.02% | 36 | Lost |
| 1991 | JATUSANAHaryana | AE | IND | 256 | 0.36% | 7 | Lost |
| 1991 | PALWALHaryana | AE | IND | 374 | 0.52% | 5 | Lost |
| 1991 | SAKEETUttar Pradesh | AE | BSP | 4,402 | 5.48% | 5 | Lost |
| 1991 | SOUTH DELHIDelhi | LS | SADM | 9,918 | 2.37% | 4 | Lost |
| 1991 | DEOBANDUttar Pradesh | AE | JD | 46,284 | 43.93% | 1 | Elected |
| 1991 | KANDHLAUttar Pradesh | AE | JD | 67,387 | 61.53% | 1 | Elected |
| 1990 | BHATTIYATHimachal Pradesh | AE | IND | 170 | 0.67% | 4 | Lost |
| 1990 | HUSSAINABADBihar | AE | JD | 16,047 | 23.68% | 2 | Lost |
| 1989 | SAHARANPURUttar Pradesh | AE | JD | 52,234 | 40.30% | 1 | Elected |
| 1989 | HARDWARUttar Pradesh | AE | JD | 36,502 | 34.55% | 1 | Elected |
| 1989 | HISSARHaryana | LS | INC | 2,46,394 | 42.94% | 2 | Lost |
| 1989 | BAREILLY CANTONMENTUttar Pradesh | AE | BSP | 942 | 1.14% | 5 | Lost |
| 1989 | BILGRAMUttar Pradesh | AE | DDP | 2,036 | 1.92% | 5 | Lost |
| 1989 | KAISERGANJUttar Pradesh | AE | IND | 655 | 0.86% | 9 | Lost |
| 1989 | ZAHOORABADUttar Pradesh | AE | INC | 23,963 | 23.27% | 1 | Elected |
| 1989 | AURAIYAUttar Pradesh | AE | IND | 200 | 0.19% | 12 | Lost |
| 1989 | KAIMGANJUttar Pradesh | AE | IND | 228 | 0.21% | 11 | Lost |
| 1989 | PATIYALIUttar Pradesh | AE | IND | 455 | 0.48% | 8 | Lost |
| 1989 | SAKEETUttar Pradesh | AE | JD | 21,550 | 27.45% | 1 | Elected |
| 1989 | KANDHLAUttar Pradesh | AE | JD | 58,277 | 57.19% | 1 | Elected |
| 1987 | NARNAUNDHaryana | AE | LKD | 45,476 | 68.95% | 1 | Elected |
| 1985 | ANUPSHAHRUttar Pradesh | AE | IND | 435 | 0.57% | 8 | Lost |
| 1985 | SAKEETUttar Pradesh | AE | JNP | 15,109 | 25.35% | 1 | Elected |
| 1982 | NARNAUNDHaryana | AE | LKD | 24,564 | 44.39% | 1 | Elected |
| 1980 | MEHNDAWALUttar Pradesh | AE | CPM | 1,537 | 2.02% | 9 | Lost |
| 1977 | NARNAUNDHaryana | AE | JNP | 25,481 | 58.54% | 1 | Elected |
Candidacies are grouped by a normalised name, which is the only key the source data offers. Two different people who share a name will appear on one page, and one person whose name was spelled differently across decades may appear on two. Check the constituency and party before treating a long career as a single person’s.
