Tilak Raj
54 candidacies between 1962 and 2024, 1 won, across 43 constituencies.
Every contest
| Year | Constituency | House | Party | Votes | Share | Position | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | BISHNAHJammu and Kashmir | AE | BSP | 660 | 0.70% | 4 | Lost |
| 2024 | RAMBANJammu and Kashmir | AE | SHS(UBT) | 567 | 0.82% | 5 | Lost |
| 2024 | GURDASPURPunjab | LS | IND | 805 | 0.07% | 20 | Lost |
| 2022 | FATEHPURHimachal Pradesh | AE | BSP | 298 | 0.46% | 5 | Lost |
| 2022 | CHHARRAUttar Pradesh | AE | BSP | 37,558 | 15.45% | 3 | Lost |
| 2022 | JAGDISHPURUttar Pradesh | AE | AAAP | 1,864 | 0.92% | 6 | Lost |
| 2019 | KARNALHaryana | LS | RGD | 774 | 0.06% | 16 | Lost |
| 2017 | INDORAHimachal Pradesh | AE | IND | 188 | 0.31% | 7 | Lost |
| 2014 | MEHAMHaryana | AE | IND | 65 | 0.05% | 14 | Lost |
| 2014 | KARNALHaryana | AE | IND | 363 | 0.26% | 10 | Lost |
| 2012 | DALHOUSIEHimachal Pradesh | AE | CPI | 1,310 | 2.84% | 3 | Lost |
| 2012 | INDORAHimachal Pradesh | AE | NCP | 734 | 1.37% | 6 | Lost |
| 2012 | BAIJNATHHimachal Pradesh | AE | IND | 1,862 | 3.91% | 4 | Lost |
| 2012 | JALANDHAR NORTHPunjab | AE | IND | 218 | 0.19% | 7 | Lost |
| 2012 | RUPNAGARPunjab | AE | IND | 2,708 | 2.36% | 6 | Lost |
| 2009 | PANIPAT RURALHaryana | AE | IND | 3,869 | 4.03% | 8 | Lost |
| 2008 | Alwar UrbanRajasthan | AE | IND | 376 | 0.37% | 10 | Lost |
| 2008 | RANBIR SINGH PURAJammu and Kashmir | AE | IND | 110 | 0.20% | 13 | Lost |
| 2007 | BILASPURHimachal Pradesh | AE | INC | 7,438 | 15.81% | 3 | Lost |
| 2007 | BHOLATHPunjab | AE | BSP | 928 | 1.03% | 4 | Lost |
| 2003 | KRISHNA NAGARDelhi | AE | IND | 109 | 0.18% | 9 | Lost |
| 2003 | BILASPURHimachal Pradesh | AE | INC | 22,868 | 50.91% | 1 | Elected |
| 2002 | SUCHETGARHJammu and Kashmir | AE | NCP | 474 | 1.15% | 8 | Lost |
| 2002 | ROORKEEUttarakhand | AE | IND | 129 | 0.27% | 13 | Lost |
| 2000 | GURGAONHaryana | AE | BJP | 17,833 | 16.71% | 3 | Lost |
| 1999 | JHANSIUttar Pradesh | LS | IND | 1,117 | 0.15% | 13 | Lost |
| 1999 | KURUKSHETRAHaryana | LS | IND | 791 | 0.11% | 7 | Lost |
| 1998 | GURDASPURPunjab | LS | IND | 1,039 | 0.15% | 9 | Lost |
| 1998 | HAPURUttar Pradesh | LS | LS | 515 | 0.07% | 14 | Lost |
| 1996 | MEHAMHaryana | AE | SHS | 129 | 0.17% | 12 | Lost |
| 1996 | GURDASPURPunjab | LS | IND | 26,928 | 4.00% | 6 | Lost |
| 1996 | CHANDIGARHChandigarh | LS | IND | 71 | 0.03% | 47 | Lost |
| 1993 | BABINAUttar Pradesh | AE | BSP | 15,874 | 12.80% | 3 | Lost |
| 1992 | DINA NAGARPunjab | AE | BJP | 9,668 | 25.03% | 2 | Lost |
| 1991 | CHANDIGARHChandigarh | LS | IND | 102 | 0.05% | 30 | Lost |
| 1991 | HALDWANIUttar Pradesh | AE | BJP | 43,410 | 38.21% | 2 | Lost |
| 1987 | REWARIHaryana | AE | IND | 39 | 0.06% | 23 | Lost |
| 1987 | JAMMU CONTONMENTJammu and Kashmir | AE | IND | 402 | 0.98% | 11 | Lost |
| 1985 | LUDHIANA EASTPunjab | AE | IND | 641 | 1.21% | 4 | Lost |
| 1985 | GULERHimachal Pradesh | AE | IND | 279 | 1.28% | 4 | Lost |
| 1985 | AMRITSAR WESTPunjab | AE | IND | 281 | 0.44% | 6 | Lost |
| 1985 | KHARARPunjab | AE | IND | 252 | 0.36% | 7 | Lost |
| 1985 | DHAUHANIMadhya Pradesh | AE | IND | 5,655 | 18.33% | 3 | Lost |
| 1983 | RANBIR SINGH PURAJammu and Kashmir | AE | IND | 52 | 0.16% | 9 | Lost |
| 1982 | NURPURHimachal Pradesh | AE | IND | 78 | 0.26% | 8 | Lost |
| 1982 | JAWALIHimachal Pradesh | AE | IND | 145 | 0.59% | 8 | Lost |
| 1980 | KHARARPunjab | AE | IND | 125 | 0.25% | 7 | Lost |
| 1977 | NURPURHimachal Pradesh | AE | IND | 93 | 0.38% | 6 | Lost |
| 1977 | SIMLAHimachal Pradesh | AE | IND | 113 | 0.57% | 4 | Lost |
| 1977 | LUCKNOW CANTONMENTUttar Pradesh | AE | IND | 51 | 0.12% | 11 | Lost |
| 1977 | NOWSHERAJammu and Kashmir | AE | JNP | 6,077 | 23.97% | 3 | Lost |
| 1977 | RANBIR SINGH PURAJammu and Kashmir | AE | IND | 960 | 3.69% | 5 | Lost |
| 1972 | JINDHaryana | AE | SOP | 185 | 0.36% | 4 | Lost |
| 1962 | NURPURPunjab | AE | CPI | 3,692 | 11.47% | 3 | Lost |
Candidacies are grouped by a normalised name, which is the only key the source data offers. Two different people who share a name will appear on one page, and one person whose name was spelled differently across decades may appear on two. Check the constituency and party before treating a long career as a single person’s.
