SHAMBHU NATH
22 candidacies between 1962 and 2012, 3 won, across 20 constituencies.
Every contest
| Year | Constituency | House | Party | Votes | Share | Position | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 | SIDHAULIUttar Pradesh | AE | LJP | 908 | 0.45% | 9 | Lost |
| 2012 | MEJAUttar Pradesh | AE | NCP | 1,523 | 0.96% | 11 | Lost |
| 2007 | AGRA EASTUttar Pradesh | AE | IND | 174 | 0.20% | 11 | Lost |
| 1998 | VARANASIUttar Pradesh | LS | IND | 974 | 0.15% | 10 | Lost |
| 1993 | JHUSIUttar Pradesh | AE | IND | 255 | 0.20% | 8 | Lost |
| 1991 | SARAIMIRUttar Pradesh | AE | IND | 132 | 0.15% | 19 | Lost |
| 1991 | FAIZABADUttar Pradesh | LS | IND | 1,386 | 0.31% | 16 | Lost |
| 1989 | DOABAUttar Pradesh | AE | BKUS | 143 | 0.16% | 8 | Lost |
| 1989 | CHILLUPARUttar Pradesh | AE | DDP | 1,301 | 1.24% | 5 | Lost |
| 1985 | PHULPURUttar Pradesh | AE | IND | 266 | 0.44% | 24 | Lost |
| 1985 | KERAKATUttar Pradesh | AE | LKD | 11,253 | 23.70% | 2 | Lost |
| 1980 | KITHOREUttar Pradesh | AE | IND | 351 | 0.55% | 8 | Lost |
| 1980 | ATRAULIAUttar Pradesh | AE | INC(I) | 28,834 | 39.52% | 1 | Elected |
| 1980 | AZAMGARHUttar Pradesh | AE | IND | 137 | 0.22% | 16 | Lost |
| 1977 | KERAKATUttar Pradesh | AE | JNP | 23,955 | 47.00% | 1 | Elected |
| 1974 | SARAIMIRUttar Pradesh | AE | IND | 904 | 1.45% | 6 | Lost |
| 1971 | SAIDPURUttar Pradesh | LS | INC | 1,36,682 | 50.96% | 1 | Elected |
| 1971 | BALLIAUttar Pradesh | LS | BKD | 22,323 | 8.63% | 3 | Lost |
| 1969 | MARTINGANJUttar Pradesh | AE | RPI | 2,422 | 5.80% | 5 | Lost |
| 1962 | KANTIT NORTHUttar Pradesh | AE | PSP | 1,403 | 3.37% | 4 | Lost |
| 1962 | SIARUttar Pradesh | AE | IND | 3,794 | 7.55% | 6 | Lost |
| 1962 | MACHHLISHAHRUttar Pradesh | LS | PSP | 54,044 | 22.97% | 3 | Lost |
Candidacies are grouped by a normalised name, which is the only key the source data offers. Two different people who share a name will appear on one page, and one person whose name was spelled differently across decades may appear on two. Check the constituency and party before treating a long career as a single person’s.
