MAM CHAND
24 candidacies between 1962 and 2014, 1 won, across 20 constituencies.
Every contest
| Year | Constituency | House | Party | Votes | Share | Position | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | KARNALHaryana | LS | CPI | 10,945 | 0.92% | 6 | Lost |
| 2009 | KARNALHaryana | LS | CPI | 13,587 | 1.68% | 5 | Lost |
| 2002 | NAGALUttar Pradesh | AE | BJP | 33,799 | 26.23% | 2 | Lost |
| 1998 | DR. AMBEDKAR NAGARDelhi | AE | IND | 45 | 0.09% | 11 | Lost |
| 1996 | NAGALUttar Pradesh | AE | BJP | 50,516 | 35.62% | 2 | Lost |
| 1996 | MORNAUttar Pradesh | AE | IND | 68 | 0.05% | 11 | Lost |
| 1996 | TAORUHaryana | AE | IND | 13 | 0.02% | 34 | Lost |
| 1996 | YAMUNANAGARHaryana | AE | IND | 146 | 0.14% | 18 | Lost |
| 1996 | SAMBHALKAHaryana | AE | CPI | 1,800 | 2.06% | 9 | Lost |
| 1996 | PUNDRIHaryana | AE | IND | 16 | 0.02% | 30 | Lost |
| 1993 | BADLIDelhi | AE | IND | 82 | 0.13% | 10 | Lost |
| 1991 | NAGALUttar Pradesh | AE | BJP | 37,624 | 40.32% | 1 | Elected |
| 1991 | MAHENDRAGARHHaryana | LS | IND | 1,135 | 0.18% | 14 | Lost |
| 1987 | PANIPATHaryana | AE | CPI | 2,500 | 3.23% | 4 | Lost |
| 1985 | BEHRORRajasthan | AE | IND | 626 | 1.11% | 4 | Lost |
| 1985 | MUZAFFARNAGARUttar Pradesh | AE | IND | 491 | 0.65% | 8 | Lost |
| 1984 | MAHENDRAGARHHaryana | LS | IND | 1,072 | 0.18% | 13 | Lost |
| 1980 | HAPURUttar Pradesh | AE | IND | 116 | 0.27% | 10 | Lost |
| 1980 | SHUTRANAPunjab | AE | BJP | 1,920 | 3.97% | 3 | Lost |
| 1980 | KHEKRAUttar Pradesh | AE | IND | 2,107 | 3.38% | 5 | Lost |
| 1974 | ROORKEEUttar Pradesh | AE | NCO | 1,421 | 1.99% | 5 | Lost |
| 1972 | SAMANAPunjab | AE | IND | 7,092 | 15.13% | 3 | Lost |
| 1962 | MEHAMPunjab | AE | IND | 2,450 | 5.67% | 3 | Lost |
| 1962 | NAWALGARHRajasthan | AE | CPI | 1,943 | 5.87% | 4 | Lost |
Candidacies are grouped by a normalised name, which is the only key the source data offers. Two different people who share a name will appear on one page, and one person whose name was spelled differently across decades may appear on two. Check the constituency and party before treating a long career as a single person’s.
