PADRA
Assembly seat no. 146 in Gujarat · Vidhan Sabha seat contested 14 times since 1962.
Every election in this seat
| Year | Winner | Runner-up | Margin | Margin % | Candidates | Turnout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | BJPCHAITANYASINH PRATAPSINH ZALA | INCJASHPALSINH MAHENDRASINH PADHIYAR | 6,178 | 3.37% | 6 | 77.1% |
| 2017 | INCTHAKOR JASHPALSINH MAHENDRASINH (PADHIYAR) | BJPPATEL DINESHBHAI BALUBHAI (DINUMAMA) | 19,027 | 10.96% | 9 | 80.7% |
| 2012 | BJPDINESHBHAI BALUBHAI PATEL (DINUMAMA) | INCTHAKOR JASHPALSINH MAHENDRASINH (PADHIYAR) | 4,308 | 2.75% | 9 | 80.1% |
| 20071973 boundaries | INDDINESHBHAI B PATEL (DINU MAMA) | BJPDR.TAKHATSINH MANGALSINH PARMAR | 14,173 | 12.07% | 6 | 64.5% |
| 20021973 boundaries | BJPPOONAM PARMAR (POONAM RANCHHODSINH PARMAR) | INDPATEL DINESHBHAI BALUBHAI (DINUMAMA) | 24,479 | 19.72% | 5 | 72.3% |
| 19981973 boundaries | AIRJPJEETSINH SOMSINH PARMAR | BJPNALINKUMAR KANTILAL BHATT | 4,751 | 4.48% | 6 | 69.5% |
| 19951973 boundaries | BJPNALIN BHATT | INDPARMAR JITSINH SOMSINH | 1,545 | 1.34% | 15 | 71.6% |
| 19901973 boundaries | JDPATEL NARENDRABHAI MAHIJIBHAI | INCPARMAR JITUBHAI SOMBHAI | 5,976 | 7.16% | 14 | 59.5% |
| 19851973 boundaries | INCPARMAR JITUBHAI SOMABHAI | JNPSHAH JASHWANTLAL SAUBHAGYACHAND | 8,291 | 12.32% | 5 | 58.2% |
| 19801973 boundaries | INC(I)JITUBHAI SOMABHAI PARMAR | JNPJPSHAH JASHVANTLAL SAUBHAGYACHAND | 7,560 | 12.69% | 4 | 57.2% |
| 19751973 boundaries | NCOSHAH JASHVANTLAL SAUBHAGYACHAND | INCPATEL MANUBHAI CHHOTABHAI | 19,216 | 29.96% | 5 | 68.1% |
| 19721966 boundaries | INCMANUBHAI CHHOTABHAI PATEL | NCOJASVANTLAL S SHAH | 5,896 | 11.42% | 5 | 63.7% |
| 19671966 boundaries | INCJ.S. SHAH | SWAS.D. PARMAR | 8,792 | 18.23% | 4 | 67.4% |
| 19621961 boundaries | SWASHANABHAI DHULABHAI PARMAR | INCCHANDRAKANT CHHOTALAL MEHTA | 91 | 0.20% | 6 | 63.3% |
Rows are matched by assembly constituency name within the state, so a seat that survived a delimitation keeps one continuous page. Where a year’s boundaries differ from the present ones the row says so — the name is the same, the territory is not.
