UMA SHANKER
25 candidacies between 1962 and 2012, 3 won, across 25 constituencies.
Every contest
| Year | Constituency | House | Party | Votes | Share | Position | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 | BANGARMAUUttar Pradesh | AE | AD | 1,141 | 0.64% | 9 | Lost |
| 2007 | SARENIUttar Pradesh | AE | BSP | 30,609 | 24.70% | 2 | Lost |
| 2003 | PICHHOREMadhya Pradesh | AE | RTKP | 2,062 | 1.39% | 7 | Lost |
| 2003 | SAKETDelhi | AE | IND | 413 | 0.69% | 7 | Lost |
| 2002 | JAKHANIAUttar Pradesh | AE | IND | 416 | 0.29% | 12 | Lost |
| 2002 | CHAUBEPURUttar Pradesh | AE | IND | 793 | 0.66% | 9 | Lost |
| 2002 | BHADOHIUttar Pradesh | AE | BSP | 34,609 | 23.66% | 2 | Lost |
| 1996 | SALEMPURUttar Pradesh | LS | IND | 918 | 0.18% | 21 | Lost |
| 1993 | PRATAPGARHUttar Pradesh | AE | IND | 77 | 0.07% | 29 | Lost |
| 1993 | SUNHAUttar Pradesh | AE | IND | 998 | 0.96% | 6 | Lost |
| 1993 | BHATPAR RANIUttar Pradesh | AE | IND | 344 | 0.26% | 14 | Lost |
| 1993 | SIARUttar Pradesh | AE | IND | 140 | 0.12% | 20 | Lost |
| 1991 | BAREILLY CANTONMENTUttar Pradesh | AE | IND | 70 | 0.07% | 22 | Lost |
| 1991 | AURAIUttar Pradesh | AE | IND | 284 | 0.27% | 9 | Lost |
| 1991 | HARDWARUttar Pradesh | AE | IND | 40 | 0.03% | 31 | Lost |
| 1989 | MIRZAPURUttar Pradesh | LS | IND | 1,358 | 0.30% | 13 | Lost |
| 1984 | AMETHIUttar Pradesh | LS | IND | 347 | 0.08% | 23 | Lost |
| 1984 | ALLAHABADUttar Pradesh | LS | IND | 3,126 | 0.72% | 3 | Lost |
| 1980 | GYANPURUttar Pradesh | AE | IND | 1,889 | 2.54% | 5 | Lost |
| 1977 | BANSDIHUttar Pradesh | AE | IND | 1,730 | 2.36% | 4 | Lost |
| 1974 | MOGALSARAIUttar Pradesh | AE | INC | 11,357 | 16.12% | 4 | Lost |
| 1969 | MOHAMMADABADUttar Pradesh | AE | BKD | 5,871 | 11.14% | 4 | Lost |
| 1969 | MUGHALSARAIUttar Pradesh | AE | INC | 26,839 | 42.06% | 1 | Elected |
| 1962 | MOGHAL SARAIUttar Pradesh | AE | SOC | 17,117 | 35.77% | 1 | Elected |
| 1962 | GOPALPURUttar Pradesh | AE | PSP | 13,437 | 33.90% | 1 | Elected |
Candidacies are grouped by a normalised name, which is the only key the source data offers. Two different people who share a name will appear on one page, and one person whose name was spelled differently across decades may appear on two. Check the constituency and party before treating a long career as a single person’s.
